Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 06:19
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Is an apple a day really good for your health? - BBC
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Measles confirmed in Colorado Springs, public asked to watch for symptoms - KKTV
Let’s just make it real clear:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
How do you say "have fun" in French?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Why do Argentinians use "vos" instead of "tú" in informal speech?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Using ChatGPT to write essays may be eroding critical thinking skills - Phys.org
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Which is the safest protein powder in India for use?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.